It is hard work
to cut down a tree, let alone an entire forest. Swidden agriculture, the
slashing, felling, and burning of forests for the conversion of land, requires
epic sweat. Every year as
the treaty is renegotiated, the reasons for and potential restraints on deforestation
are both elaborated and clarified. When we talk about forested land, we are
also talking about agricultural expansion and food security for a growing
population. While an excess of carbon dioxide haunts our atmosphere, we have
more than one problem to proactively and reactively solve. We are talking about
livelihoods, family planning, land sparing, sustainable farming, the intensification
of yield.
Ban Ki-moon arrived in
Durban late in the second week of the conference. As Secretary General of the United
Nations, he is the man in charge of haloing 194 nations around the singular agreement
on climate change. When I saw him speak, he was deferent to his own stature, understating
his vast importance to the world. Ban Ki-moon spoke of the forests and the
noted improvements to the REDD text. Recently retuned from a visit to
Kalimantan, Indonesia, he lauded the success of their pilot program for REDD.
In particular, he praised Kuntoro
Mangkusubroto, Chairman
of the Indonesian REDD+ Taskforce. Kuntoro
himself was also at this talk. Later in the evening, a question was posed to
him about Indonesia’s REDD program. “How far are you from being able to count
the value of a tree standing as being more than the value of a tree cut down?”
To which the minister of ministers replied, “It is not about each tree. It is
about poverty. If you alleviate poverty, no tree will be cut down.” The
ambition of this treaty is that it must address both the causes and the effects
of global warming. Which makes it, perhaps, the most important international
accord ever to be signed.
No comments:
Post a Comment