In case anyone is unclear, because it’s hard to get the news from the news, the advancements
in Durban mean the process, while incremental, still has traction.
Initial
discussions centering on an international climate agreement first began at the Rio Summit
in 1992. The agreement was negotiated for five years before being adopted in
1997 as the Kyoto Protocol. It was another four years before detailed rules for
the implementation of the KP were approved in 2001. It officially entered force
in 2005, thirteen years hence. This year, 2012, marks the end of the KP’s first
commitment period. All this scrambling to sign the Durban Platform, twenty
years in the making, is another train stop along the way, in essence to
say, “what is next and who is still on board?”
It
takes this long because we can’t ask for everything at once. The US State
Department has a mandate they are not legally allowed to negotiate for something
at the international level that they are unable to implement at the
national level. In fact, it is a convention truism that countries will not
agree inside a negotiation room to anything they were not already planning to
do.
In
reality, the world as a collective is not ready for the treaty it should be
signing. But we will be. In the meantime, we will continue to address all the
drivers and respect all the safeguards. We will train the tree measurers and come to terms with true national sovereignty. The pace of this process, both
progress and regress, is not for nothing. Redaction, bracketing, and derailment. Word
by word. Insertion and accord.
No comments:
Post a Comment